TWO AND A HALF YEARS ON AND POWER SAVING STILL NOT IMPLEMENTED

PRESS RELASE:
The introduction of a new power management system at County Hall has been postponed. The system, which it has been shown can save upto 30% on energy used by computers has been tested at Hopper House and Priory House in County Durham and was due to be rolled out by the Council on July 20th.
The system was recommended to the council in early 2009 by County Councillor Mark Wilkes, Framwellgate Moor Division.
Councillor Wilkes commented “In January 2009 I emailed all members and the Chief Executive recommending that we introduce this type of system. Whilst I am happy that the Council decided belatedly to do this, we are clearly moving at a snails pace.”
“For it to take over 2 and half years to implement this proposal is shocking. The Council could have already saved tens if not hundreds of thousands pounds across the County if it had got its act together earlier.”
These type of systems can be normally introduced within a matter of weeks by large organisations and work by automatically placing computers on standby or closing them down completely after a period of inactivity.
Councillor Wilkes added “The lost savings from years of delay would have helped protect frontline services and the blame must lie at Labour’s door – once again wasting money and failing to save taxpayers money.”
“I look forward to the system being fully implemented at the earliest opportunity.”

The introduction of a new power management system at County Hall has been postponed. The system, which it has been shown can save upto 30% on energy used by computers has been tested at Hopper House and Priory House in County Durham and was due to be rolled out by the Council on July 20th.

The system was recommended to the council in early 2009 by County Councillor Mark Wilkes, Framwellgate Moor Division.
Councillor Wilkes commented “In January 2009 I emailed all members and the Chief Executive recommending that we introduce this type of system. Whilst I am happy that the Council decided belatedly to do this, we are clearly moving at a snails pace.”

“For it to take over 2 and half years to implement this proposal is shocking. The Council could have already saved tens if not hundreds of thousands pounds across the County if it had got its act together earlier.”

These type of systems can be normally introduced within a matter of weeks by large organisations and work by automatically placing computers on standby or closing them down completely after a period of inactivity.

Councillor Wilkes added “The lost savings from years of delay would have helped protect frontline services and the blame must lie at Labour’s door – once again wasting money and failing to save taxpayers money.”

“I look forward to the system being fully implemented at the earliest opportunity.”

The system has now been delayed as a large number of computer users have asked for their systems to be exempted from pat or all of the program.

CHARTER TRUST TRAVEL EXPENSES PLAN DUMPED

Last week I commented that a few Labour councillors wanted to be able to claim travel expenses for attending Charter Trust meetings. Today we unanimously ditched the idea, including the Labour councillors who were present.  Strangely, those who had called for this were absent- perhaps on holiday, perhaps not.

Anyway another victory for common sense.

TOURIST INFORMATION CENTRE

At next weeks Full Coucil meeting I will be proposing a motionb that the council continues to have a dedicated Tourist Information Centre in Durham City.

At the same meeting a petition of over 7000 names will be put to the council by a resident, completely non-political.

It is clear to me that to scrap the TIC is one of the most short sighted things the Labour Council has ever decided to do.

At last nights Area Action Partnership,  even Labour members voiced concerns over this and called on the council to retain a dedicated TIC.

The proposal I will be putting forward with Cllr Stoker next week will offer a solution which is that the TIC should be moved to the Town Hall Foyer, where until some years ago it was anyway. A staffed facility here will cost very little to the council and is absolutely affordable.

The ludicrous position we will face in a few months is that a World Heritage Site City, Capital of the County will not have a Tourist Information Centre. I honestly believe that the decision by Labour to do this was done in haste, without proper consideration, and that there is still time to pull back from this and support a proposal which will ensure that visitors, businesses and residents will still have a world class service instead of not one member of the 21 Tourism staff being face to face with the public on a daily basis.

Come on Durham County Council and Labour councillors, recognise that scrapping the TIC is a mistake and that we can still afford to offer a facility for our great City.

NORBURN PARK RESURFACING

Following my repeated requests, Norburn Park in Witton Gilbert has now had its road resurfaced. Another success. Newton Drive, Ashleigh Av and Aykley Road were also completed a few weeks ago – all from requests I have put in in the last year or so.

UPDATE ON MEETING OVER GREENBELT AND COUNTY DURHAM PLAN

TODAY’S MEETING

Following a meeting  today with Ian Thompson, Corporate Director for Regeneration and Economic Development, and conversations with senior planning officers, I can provide the following update on the County Durham Plan, specifically in relation to Durham City Greenbelt issues.

I still personally believe that it is fundamentally wrong to build on the existing greenbelt around Durham City.

In relation to land North of the Arnison Centre which, according to various sources has been acquired or rights acquired by Ainscough Strategic Land (ASL), I have been told that no meetings have taken place in relation to this piece of land between ASL and the Council – though the Council has discussed land in Bishop Auckland with this company.

 However, there have been meetings with land owners of sites currently being considered under the County Durham Plan, including this land prior to the current apparent change in ownership.

COUNCIL PREFERENCE TO BUILD ON GREENBELT

I am also told that the revised Plan when released for consultation in coming months, will state that the preference of the Council is to build on the Green Belt. This to me implies that the Consultation on whether to build on greenbelt has become a tick box exercise in the eyes of the Council.

With this in mind, whilst I still fundamentally disagree with building on the Green Belt, and think we should do all we can to stop this, I feel it is also necessary for all possible options to be looked at to mitigate such development should it happen.

Any proposals which can be put forward to reduce impact on the greenbelt must be considered.

The Council has not considered all potential development sites both inside and outside of Durham City which could be built on BUT ARE NOT GREENBELT.

The Council strategy is that they want to build as many houses as close to Durham City as their plan allows for. I believe that surrounding villages, and land within the City have not been considered in their calculations.

LARGE PIECES OF LAND NOT CONSIDERED

I firmly believe that up to 2000 houses could be built on land which is not greenbelt within a few miles of the City, thus protecting around half of the greenbelt which would be lost, and further that if greenbelt is to be built on, the way in which this land is developed could be done in such a way as to considerably reduce the impact on these areas.

By way of example, looking at Bearpark, the provision of additional housing in the village would make the existing businesses more sustainable and reduce impact on the wider greenbelt. This could also include a new primary school building and community centre hub. The Strategic Land Assessment appears to suggest 150 additional properties here but more could be accommodated with improvements to local roads and facilities. To date, no housing provision has been mentioned for Bearpark.

In other areas, similar housing provision is possible. There is the potential for some additional housing in Witton Gilbert for example.

Both villages need to be fully consulted as part of the Council Plan as whatever happens it will effect the residents in these areas.

Any discussion on this is of course dependent upon the Council’s  belief that we need this number of houses being correct. I have not been convinced that we need this number of additional houses.

FACILTIES

As the Council is going to press ahead with this consultation, a discussion now also needs to start as to what additional facilities will be forthcoming for the affected areas, and also what the improvements to the existing areas which are going to be impacted will be.

Having looked at the initial Council Plan, it is clear that the impact on Framwellgate Moor and Pity Me will be huge.

Some of the examples of things which will have to be provided and which if the plan goes ahead I will be pushing for include:

Increased parkland and recreational areas

Additional allotments

Additional primary school places and improved existing comprehensive school facilities – potentially a new school

More healthcare facilities such as doctors, dentists, Sure Start, improvements to local shops and potentially more shops.

Improvements to the existing housing estates and streets including for example the upgrading of unadopted roads in Framwellgate Moor and Pity Me such as the terraces to the rear of Framwellgate Moor Front Street and the back lanes at rear of Front St, Pity Me .

Improvements and guarantees for the existing Community Centre in Framwellgate Moor and potential provision of further community buildings. [The community buildings review has still not been released and will be 10 months overdue if released in September].

Improved indoor leisure facilities – including the guarantee that Abbey Leisure Centre returns to full opening hours. [Note that I am meeting with officers on Thursday to discuss the way forward for protecting as much as possible at Abbey. Seems crazy to cut back hours at a centre if you are planning to build 4000 houses on the doorstep!]

A clear plan to mitigate the potential increase in traffic levels – which is where debate on the proposed bypasses will come in.

TYPE OF HOUSING AND THE ENVIRONMENT

Any consideration for new housing must take into account the existing problems in the area in relation to provision of affordable housing.

This must not just be about the cost to buy or rent, but also the cost to live in. So proper bus routes, zero carbon homes with very low energy requirements, proper use of and dispersal of rainwater to avoid flooding.

There also needs to be a much more in depth consideration of the impacts on wildlife given the number of at risk species which can be found on much of these areas.

CONCLUSION

I am not convinced that we need 5000 new homes in Durham City and do not believe we should be building on the greenbelt.

I do believe that if houses are to be built, there are large areas of land which are not greenbelt which could accommodate housing and have not been considered due to the Council’s strategy of wanting the new housing to be within Durham and not in the surrounding villages.

It is clear that existing residents must see guarantees of improvements to the existing area including regeneration, provision of recreational land, allotments and improved community and leisure facilities.

Issues relating to traffic are a critical point and additional houses must be accompanied by road infrastructure improvements and measures to reduce car usage.

At every stage going forward the Council must be honest with residents about how many houses are being proposed to be built and exactly where.

A wide variety of housing must be provided and must be affordable to live in and carbon neutral.

The Council must prove that it has consulted with all residents about its plans and this should be more than just meetings. Every household in the most affected areas should be written to with a dedicated survey to complete and return.

ABBEY – MEETING WITH OFFICERS THIS WEEK

I have arranged a meeting this week between the Director of Neighbourhoods, myself and Newton Hall councillors and the head of the Steering group which bid for Abbey, to discuss what we see as the requirements for Abbey Leisure Centre. Going forward we want to see if the changes to opening hours can be kept to a minimum. I also want to see the council promote the centre more, help us install a youth gym facility, upgrade the conference facilities, install solar panels to cut costs and Co2 emissions and help address a number of other problems at the centre.

To find out what you can do at the centre in the coming months visit: www.durham.gov.uk/sports

ROAD WORKS – PITY ME and Witton Gilbert

The repairs tothe road at Pity Me Front St are for electric mains work (reason for the traffic lights). It is scheduled to be complete no later than the 17th.

Electric works are also to take place on Norburn Lane in Witton Gilbert on the 27th July, and part of Brookside in Witton Gilbert will be closed for the carriageway rebuilding I pushed for, on the 28th July.

DEVELOPER BUYS GREENBELT – WHAT DOES COUNCIL KNOW?

I HAVE JUST DISCOVERED that a huge 180 acre site North of Durham (North of the Arnison Centre) has been acquired by developers within the the Durham greenbelt, possibly following discussions with Durham County Council. I have called for an urgent meeting with the Director of Regeneration and Economic Development Ian Thompson for Monday morning and am demanding information as to what negotiations have already taken place with land owners and developers.

Only a few weeks ago senior officers said that discussion on building on the greenbelt would be a full, honest and proper consultation process starting in September.

It it would appear that behind the scenes something has been going on and I want to know what. If a developer is willing to buy 180 acres of land, likely costing in excess of £10m, then they must have had conversations with the Council. This makes a mockery of the consultation process. In fact it stinks. No one should trust this Labour-run Council. They clearly couldn’t care less about Durham City, its wonderful environment or its residents and have no respect for the democratic process.

The gloves are off. There appears to be no trust or honestly left at County Hall. We need to protect as much of our greenbelt as we can and get the best deal possible for local residents if this Council do manage to get their way.

The Manchester Evening News published the following on the 14th July:

Ainscough Strategic Land completes its biggest deal – 180-acre Durham site

Wigan- based Ainscough Strategic Land has completed its biggest deal to date, securing a 180-acre site in Durham.

Hagg House Farm is the largest site acquired by ASL, owned by tycoon Martin Ainscough, in its four-year history and brings the company’s portfolio to ten sites nationwide, a total of more than 600 acres.

Paul Martin, land director at ASL said: “We are delighted to have secured the Hagg House Farm site and look forward to working closely with Durham County Council to maximise its contribution to the future growth of the region.”

NEW COURSES AT FRAM COMMUNITY CENTRE

Courses at Framwellgate Community Centre

Starting September 2011

Digital Imaging Starting Tuesday 13th September 6.30 – 8.30

Learn how to move pictures from your camera to your computer and improve the image

First Step IT Starting Thursday 15th September 6.30 – 8.30

Learn the basics of computing

Employability Skills Starting Friday 16th September 10.00 – 12.00 Brush up on your CV, application form, letter writing, job search, to enable you to find the job you want

Tai Chi Starting Wednesday 14th September 10.00 – 12.00 Exercise your Mind and Body with this oriental delight.

For further information Contact:

Terry Simpson on 0191 3863356

Or

Ian Defty on 0191 3839176