COUNCIL TAX FREEZES?

The Council Tax in our area is made up of Five elements – County Council, Parish Council, Police, Fire and Charter Trust (Mayoralty).

For most people the Mayoralty is less than £5 a year, the big element (over £1000) is for the County Council.  For the Parish Councils it is around £30 a year.

The Coalition Govt has offered 2.5% for councils if they freeze council tax for residents. If implemented by Durham County Council will mean a second successive year of Council Tax freeze compared to a doubling of Council Tax under the Labour government.

Each council has to decide if it wants to accept the 2.5% grant or ask for more money from taxpayers.  I expect DCC will accept the grant offer, freezing the biggest portion of council tax.

What is less certain is with regards to the Police and Fire and Parish elements of the council tax.  As a member of Framwellgate Moor Parish Council I get the feeling that there is no desire from Lib Dem or Independent Councillors to increase the parish precept. Waiting to find out about Bearpark and Witton Gilbert parishes.

Police and Fire have not yet announced any figures however an offer from government to pay for a 3% rise, if accepted could mean no council tax rise at all for residents.

The final part of the Council tax bill – is a few pounds for the Charter Trust and Mayoralty of Durham City. Last year I negotiated with the County Council alongside other Lib Dem Charter trustees and reduced down service costs and consequently the Charter trust levy by 14%. I will be pushing for a minimum of a freeze this year and personally think we could reduce the figure down a bit more.

The more money in residents pockets the better.

GARDEN WASTE COLLECTIONS – END FIRST/SECOND WEEK NOVEMBER

Time to start tidying the garden. The garden waste collections are scheduled to end the first and second week of November, although with the recent mild weather we might find a lot of leaves still needing cleaning up after this date! I have been pushing the council for months to include details on their website of garden waste times but so far no action.  It’s a joke how many things you can’t check for on the council website.  if they got more information onto the site, they would have fewer delays when people call with more serious issues.

BIG BUS CHANGES ON WAY FROM ARRIVA

For a number of weeks I have been trying to get someaction to ensure that when there are changes to bus services in our county councillors get told so that they can respond to residents concerns.  I have also been trying to get some action to improve buses going to Brasside following cut backs in services.

Today councillors received details of the following big changes to services run by Arriva (good that we are finally being told in advance of it happening), however the news itself is not good at all.

The main bus companies in our county get millions of pounds in grants from the government but are still cutting back on services – some of it due to grant reductions, some to increases in fuel bills. Perhaps they should be getting more efficient buses onto routes as the number of old bangers travelling around our county is still unacceptable. Buses seem to get sent up to the North East once they are ruled too polluting to be used in London. This has to be part of the reason for cutbacks – though clearly not all. Invest in more efficient buses and it wont cost as much to run the services.

Changes:

We have just been given advanced notice by Arriva of forthcoming changes to their commercial bus services (ie services they run without subsidy from the County Council) with effect from the start of January 2012.

South west Co Durham

95/96 Middleton – Barnard Castle

To be withdrawn entirely. Currently 1 p h M-Sat daytime

84 Bishop Auckland – Cockfield – Darlington.

Cockfield – Darlington section to be withdrawn. Currently approx every 2 hrs

85 Bishop Auckland – Cockfield – Barnard Castle.

Cockfield – Barnard Castle section to be withdrawn. Currently approx every 2 hrs

86/87 Bishop A – Toft Hill – West Auckland – Bishop Auckland

Arriva still to finalise plans, but current intention is to withdraw of the Ramshaw – Toft Hill – Bishop Auckland Section. (Currently 1 ph)

19 Bishop Auckland – Woodhouse Close

To be withdrawn, but partially replaced by diversion of service 85 to run 2 ph via Woodhouse like the current eve and Sunday service.

36A  Bishop Auckalnd – Coundon

To be withdrawn (currently 2 p hr)

Note the the Bishop Auckland – Ferryhill svc 35/56 continues, so Coundon will still 2 p hr to Bishop Auckland)

Spennymoor / Ferryhill / Trimdons area:

8 Spennymoor – Chilton – Darlington

Revised to include York Hill section of current svc 69; between Spennymoor and Kirk Merrington rerouted via Middlestone Moor, replacing aprt of service 56; between Kirk Merrington and Chilton rerouted to run via Ferryhill, Ferryhill Station and Chilton Lane, replacing part of service 69. Details of routing in Ferryhill to be confirmed.

55 Sedgefield – Trimdon- Cassop – Durham

To be withdrawn entirely (currently 1 p hr)

56 Bishop Auckland – Spennymoor – Ferryhill – Durham.

To be truncated to run Spennymoor – Ferryhill – Durham, and to omit Bishop Middleham; remains 1 p hr. Timetable and route in Coxhoe- Durham corridor revised to take up the slot in the 20 min frequency currently provided by service 55.

69 Tudhoe York Hill – Spennymoor – Sedgefield

To be withdrawn entirely. See service 8 for alternative local links in the Ferryhill – Spennymoor section.

Durham area:

46 Crook – Durham:

To be revised to operate as an extension of the Brandon – Durham svc 49, ie a reduction in the combined frequency in Meadowfield – Durham section by 3 ph.

LATEST COUNTY PLAN DOCUMENTS

HOUSING AND RELIEF ROAD PROPOSALS

The link in this message contains a pdf showing the information I mentioned last week regarding the more detailed proposals for development of land at various locations as part of the Councils proposals to build new housing and relief roads around Durham City. I have split it into 9 parts so the files are smaller. It is in the form of a presentation given to councillors last week. When you have opened one file, to return to this page, click back arrow/button on browser.

This information is to be made available to view on large boards at Framwellgate Moor Community Centre from 4pm to 8pm on 17th October where council officers will be on hand to answer questions. (Other locations also detailed in Part 9).

My initial views can be seen below in previous blog last week.

It is possible that the large number of people viewing this could cause the site to slow down in the next few days. Please feel free t email me if you would like the whole think sending to you by email (About 5mb).

Part1-Presentation

Part2-AykleyHeads

Part3-SniperleyPark

Part4-NewGrangeHagHouse

Part5-SherburnRoad

Part6-WesternReliefRoad

Part7-NorthernReliefRoad

Part8-Historical

Part9-AlternativesEventsContacts

Road closure advanced notice – AYKLEY HEADS TO COUNTY HALL

B6532 County Hall Roundabout to Aykley Heads Roundabout,

Durham City

Temporary Road Closure Notice

The County Council intend to close to vehicular traffic, from 00.01 hours on Sunday 9 October 2011 a 550 metre length of B6532 between its junctions with County Hall and Aykley Heads roundabouts, Durham City.

The closure, which is being effected by means of Notice under Section 14(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, is necessary to enable carriageway resurfacing, which will probably take until 06.00 hours on Monday 10 October 2011 to complete, to be carried out to that length of road.

Throughout the period of closure an alternative route will be available to vehicular traffic from the south eastern side of the closure from County Hall roundabout north westerly along A691 to A167 Sniperley Roundabout then north easterly along Dryburn Park Road to Blackie Boy roundabout then south easterly along Dryburn Road to the north western side of the closure and vice versa.

COUNTY PLAN UPDATE

Councillors in Durham City area received an update this morning on the next stage of consultation on the County Durham Plan – Greenbelt and Bypasses.

I am waiting for a copy of the presentation so I can upload it.

Key proposals for consultation from the Council are as follows. I did get some estimates on housing numbers:

Three main housing sites proposed, plus development of Mount Oswald and Aykley Heads.

Sherburn Road – Est. 500 houses on land to East of Sherburn Road.

Hag House (North of Arnison Centre) – Est. 500-800 houses, including possibly land running from Red House to Newton Grange  (before going into Brasside)

Sniperley – Area increased considerably in size (more than previously consulted on), going across the Potterhouse Lane boundary formerly suggested, with est.  2000-2800 potential houses, as well as a possible community hub/centre.

Aykley Heads – Mainly redeveloped for commercial buildings, but with some housing around current police headquarters area.

——

Routes of bypasses (North and Western) more clearly defined with details of potentially sensitive areas along their routes.

Northern bypass running between Brasside and Newton Hall, but closer to Newton Hall side than perhaps previously outlined. With route crossing River Wear roughly 1km south of Belmont Viaduct and joining the A690.

Western Bypass route from Sniperley Roundabout area, crossing Bearpark Road and coming out between Stonebridge and Broompark.

——

INITIAL VIEW:

The increase in the size of the land to the West/North of Sniperley on the way to Witton Gilbert/Sacriston brings into question the initial rounds of consultation which did not include a big chunk of this land. Clearly if all the area being proposed was developed it would encroach even more on Sacriston.

The reduction in the proposed housing numbers on Hag House area from 2186 to 500-800 estimate appears to be partly due to the topography of the area.

The question still remains as to whether any of these sites  should be opened up for development at all.

The two bypasses will pass through some very sensitive areas of countryside and the Northern Bypass will require a substantial bridge structure visible from the World heritage Site.

Plans can be viewed at Framwellgate Moor Community Centre on 17th October from 4pm to 8pm.

——-

I made it very clear at this mornings meeting that increasing the area of land on the Sniperley site makes a mockery of the initial rounds of consultation. I also made it clear that any development must be contingent on improvements to the existing Pity Me, Framwellgate Moor, Newton Hall and Brasside areas including such things as regeneration of existing communities, improvements to highways and footpaths and upgrading of unadopted roads, more parkland and open spaces and improvements to infrastructure (schools, doctors, etc).

The Community Infrastructure levy which could be imposed as part of these plans is capable of including this, though clearly it is time to find out what local residents feel overall about whether any development should go ahead based on these new proposals and what residents would expect to see if this did go ahead.

What it is important to remember in all of this is that it is proposals for the next 20 years, although it was mentioned that the Western Bypass would have to go ahead within 3-5 years for the rest of the development to occur.

SHERBURN CENTRE SAVED – PUSHING FOR YOUTH PROVISION AT ABBEY

Well done to everyone in Sherburn for pulling together a proposal through the Parish Council to stop Labour from bulldozing the Leisure Centre!

In Pity Me we are looking forward to more investment following discussions with the Council, so whilst the opening hours are being reduced, we are confident the centre can be turned around. I had a meeting yesterday with council youth and leisure officers to work towards getting more investment in the Newton Hall and Framwellgate Moor/Pity Me area for youth provision, as it is clear that the area doesn’t get its fair share at the moment.

In the coming months we should be able to announce some positive news following consultation with young people in the area.